Pages

Saturday, December 30, 2017

FIDE Plans Chess Olympiad in Saudi Arabia

Per Emil Sutovsky in Facebook today--"FIDE announces plans to stage the Olympiad in Riyadh, players praise the high level of organization, chess journalists are excited about many aspects of the event... What an idyllic picture. Somewhere in a parrallel world, Israeli players barred from the participation, Muzychuks' decision to boycott the tournament is supported by hundreds of thousands all over the World, mass media are raging, and ACP launches Tournament of the Year contest not listing the event in Riyadh, as the official Championship where eligible players are not allowed in does not deserve it."

What will the US Chess position be on the selection of this country as the Olympiad site absent a guarantee that all countries will be allowed to participate and that women will not be harassed with head covering requirements?

Maybe They Play Lots of Chess In Some Dutch Cafes?


Wednesday, December 27, 2017

Remembering IM Josef Vatnikov

This is the book that IM Josef Vatnikov self-published in 2005. I met him and bought the book when I played in my first simul. He autographed it for me.....after he crushed me in the simul. The forward is written by Vassily Smyslov. Smyslov writes that Vatnikov was the coach and head of the Moscow State University chess club for 25 years. There is a photo of the two of them standing in a transport car at the mouth of a coal mine ready to go down into the mine on the invitation of the miners, presumably to play a simul. (I'll copy and scan that photo) Vatnikov fought and was wounded in the Battle of Stalingrad. The book is dedicated to his parents, grandparents and two others, Riva and Chaim, who died at the hands of the Nazis during WWII.



Israeli Chess Federation Replies to FIDE Press Release

I would hope that the Israelis take FIDE before CAS in Switzerland. FIDE does not have the best track record before that tribunal. 

The text of the Israeli reply follows:

December 26, 2017 
To : FIDE Attention - Mr. G. Makropoulos

FIDE'S Offensive and unacceptable behavior about the World Championship - Saudi Arabia December 25 - 30, 2017

We have read with astonishment the press release published on December 25th on FIDE website and which reads : "FIDE secured visas for Qatar and Iran ".

It is not surprising that this press release is not even signed, as it is not only an insult to simple logic but also a shame for FIDE.

There is not even a word in it about the issue of visas to Israeli players, and the "record" of the "logic" of this document comes towards its end : " As everybody clearly understands from the above , FIDE and Saudi organizer are always ready to welcome any participant " ... On such sentences we say : " To read and not to believe " !
This sentence means that in the eyes of FIDE Israeli players are not included in the list of "any participant " .

Let me state very clearly that the agreement signed with Sadia Arabia federation about the event is totally illegal , contradicting FIDE statutes - Article 1.2. a , not having an official form which every bidder for an event in FIDE should fill, and therefore should be immediately cancelled.
I am aware of the fact that it is impractical to cancel the event today , but before considering taking legal actions against FIDE and / or against those who signed this contract I am demanding , in the name of the Israeli Chess Federation the following :

1. As mentioned, to cancel immediately the contract with Sadia Arabia federation about organizing the same event in 2018 - 2019 .
2. To compensate the Israeli players who were denied visas and could not participate in the event .
3. To declare that such a case , which ignores the FIDE statutes , will not repeat itself .

I would appreciate an answer to this letter in the coming days .

Dr. Zvika Barkai

Chairman of The Israeli Chess Federation

Tuesday, December 26, 2017

The Situation In Saudi Arabia: An Incomplete and Self-Serving FIDE Statement

Word from ACP President Emil Sutovsky this morning is that at the Rapid and Blitz World Championships in Saudi Arabia, women are not being required to wear any head covering in the playing hall or the hotel where the even is taking place. They must wear head covering out side of these places.

FIDE issued a statement declaring that visas have been issued for players from Iran and Qatar to enter Saudi Arabia and play in this event.

Per FIDE, "FIDE has been working very hard and in a discreet manner to organise and safeguard the process of entry visas for all participants of the event. For the first time, ground-breaking special arrangements have been made to issue visas upon arrival for over 200 persons, including the players of Iran and Qatar..............As everybody clearly understands from the above, FIDE and the Saudi organisers are always ready to welcome any participant."[Emphasis Added]

"Any participant" does not include Israeli players. Gens Una Sumus------NOT!

http://www.fide.com/component/content/article/1-fide-news/10587-fide-secured-visas-for-qatar-and-iran.html

The President of the Association of Chess Professionals Protests FIDE Championship in Saudi Arabia

The FIDE World Rapid and Blitz Championship begins today Saudi Arabia with visas not being granted to players from Israel, Iran and Qatar. It's not clear if women players will be required to wear the hijab.

ACP President Emil Sutovsky has called out players who, whilst not attending the event, did so with the rather lame excuse that they were otherwise engaged. Bravo and Brava to those players boycotting the event by stating their opposition to the policies of the repressive Saudi state.

Emil Sutovsky write this morning on Facebook:
"I call upon Western journalists and bloggers to stop with this hypocricy: "only Nakamura and Muzychuk boycotted, all others had their reasons and another plans". Nearly all US players skip the event. More than half of the top Russian players did the same. Giri, Radjabov, Adams, Topalov, Wojtaszek, Navara, two dozens of 2650+ players who had a personal right to play decided not to go. Other plans? Come on, stop with this rubbish. Professionals don't skip a 2 million World Championship because they have other plans. You have an event with the best financial conditions in history of chess, and about 40% of the top players are skipping it. Other plans, really? True - most of the players avoided making loud statements. But "other plans"? Come on, be serious."

Friday, December 22, 2017

New Logo Proposal for FIDE

In view of the logo developed for the World Chess Championship 2018 in London, I propose this as the new logo for FIDE. IMO, it is in line with the screwing FIDE gives the chess world on a daily basis.
(c) 2017 Brian Lafferty

Sunday, December 17, 2017

Kingdom Chess Club Launches New Web Site

Based at Cobleigh Library in Lyndonville, VT, Kingdom Chess Club has a new web site that can be found at the following link:
https://kingdomchessvt.org/

Wednesday, December 13, 2017

The Future of International Chess--FIDE, the Grand Chess Tour, Universal Rating System and the Power of Money

The URS has much to do with Rex Sinquefield, Gary Kasparov, the Grand Chess Tour and Jeff Sonas of Chessmetrics, Mark Glickman, J. Isaac Miller and Maxime Rischard. The research and creation of the system resulted from a collaborative research project funded by the Grand Chess Tour, the Kasparov Chess Foundation and the Chess Club of Saint Louis.* There is now a good deal of money behind the use of URS because of the events and prize lists involved with the GCT. Should the GCT decide to totally ignore FIDE ratings in selecting qualifiers for the GCT, that could set up a power struggle between FIDE on the one hand and the GCT with its quite wealthy backers on the other. 

Another related aspect of such a power struggle could arise if Caruana becomes the challenger for the WCC in 2018. Enter Rex and his billions once again. It has been reported that if Cauruana is the challenger, Rex may seek to have the WCC match moved to St. Louis.** Might there be a battle of the billionaires for control of international chess? Would a well funded alternative international organization be able, with significant prize money on offer, to draw enough of the self-motivated elite chess masters to its event as opposed to financially struggling FIDE. What if Magnus and Fabio, for the right amount of money, agree to play in St. Louis for the championship under GCT/URS sanction and not FIDE sanction. Money talks......how, after all, did Fabio come to switch his national affiliation? How much money would it take to draw the top women to a GCT backed Women's World Championship, not in Iran or Saudi Arabia, but in London, Paris or St. Louis?

As to US Chess and other national federations as they now exist, it's been said that what they offer is little more than rating systems in return for membership dollars. URS is free to use. What happens to US Chess if organizers here in the US start dual rating their events. What if clubs start using URS to rate club events, matches between clubs, between states. 

It's mostly about money and power. Relatively speaking, I don't think it would take all that much money to take over international chess in a defacto way making FIDE a dunsel organization. That could be quite a legacy for an aging Rex to leave the world of chess.......and still have $1billion+ to leave to others in his Last Will and Testament. 

* The rating algorithm was designed and developed by a research team which consisted of Maxime Rischard, J. Isaac Miller, Mark Glickman and Jeff Sonas. This team conducted extensive testing before finalizing the rating algorithm and found that the URS™ consistently predicted game results better than the existing ELO system used by the World Chess Federation. The superior results were observed “on a consistent basis, from year to year, and across all three rating categories”.

Another major draw-card of the URS™ rating system is that it will be free to use for any local organizers or chess federations that wish to make use of it. This is expected to be a major attraction as it will allow scholastic players and locally based amateur players to quickly achieve a URS™ rating by simply playing in their local events.

http://news.stlpublicradio.org/post/chess-launch-universal-rating-system-opens-doors-global-chess-community#stream/0

** Leonard Barden recently wrote: "The actual venue has yet to be announced although the organisers say they have several short-listed options. The prize fund is the world body Fide’s minimum of $1m, which could yet present a problem if Fabiano Caruana wins the eight-man candidates in Berlin in March. In that case the billionaire Rex Sinquefield, who has made his home city of St Louis into a global chess capital and who could easily fund a much larger purse, may try to have the match switched to the US."
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2017/dec/01/london-confirmed-for-magnus-carlsen-title-defence

(c) 2017 Brian Lafferty

Monday, December 11, 2017

Caruana Wins the London Chess Classic

Fabio Caruana has won the London Chess Classic by winning his final round game to tie Nepomniachtchi and force a tiebreak. Caruana won the tiebreak against Nepomniachtchi, 1 1/2 - 1/2. 
Now, on to the candidates' tournament.



Sunday, December 10, 2017

Nepomniachtchi Defeats Carlsen and Leads the London Chess Classic

[Event "9th London Chess Classic 2017"]
[Site "London"]
[Date "2017.12.10"]
[Round "8"]
[White "Carlsen, Magnus"]
[Black "Nepomniachtchi, Ian"]
[Result "0-1"]
[Annotator "ChessBase"]
[BlackElo "2729"]
[ECO "A04"]
[EventCountry "ENG"]
[EventDate "2017.??.??"]
[EventType "tourn"]
[PlyCount "80"]
[Source "ChessBase"]
[TimeControl "40/6000+30:3600+30"]
[WhiteElo "2837"]
1. Nf3 {1} 1... c5 {35} 2. c3 {30} 2... d5 {30} 3. d4 {30} 3... cxd4 {30} 4.
cxd4 {30} 4... Nc6 {30 } 5. Nc3 {30} 5... Nf6 {30} 6. Bf4 {30} 6... Nh5 {30}
7. Bd2 {65} 7... Nf6 {30} 8. e3 {199} 8... e6 {251} 9. Bd3 {234} 9... Bd6 {264}
10. e4 {192} 10... dxe4 {76} 11. Nxe4 {30} 11... Be7 {30} 12. O-O {39} 12...
O-O {149} 13. Qc2 {655} 13... h6 {225} 14. Rad1 {36} 14... Bd7 {33} 15. a3
{252} 15... Rc8 {30} 16. Nc3 {62} 16... a6 {254} 17. Qc1 {371} 17... Re8 {30}
18. Rfe1 {928} 18... Bf8 {122} 19. Bf4 {342} 19... b5 {71} 20. Qd2 {57} 20...
b4 {112} 21. axb4 {264} 21... Nxb4 {60} 22. Ne5 { 396} 22... Nxd3 {472} 23.
Qxd3 {30} 23... a5 {53} 24. Qf3 {908} 24... Bb4 {279} 25. Re3 {82} 25... Bxc3
{414} 26. bxc3 {169} 26... Ba4 {30} 27. Ra1 {57} 27... Bc2 {30} 28. h3 {263}
28... Bf5 {243} 29. g4 {268} 29... Bh7 {30} 30. c4 {73} 30... Nd7 {657} 31.
Nc6 {75} 31... Qf6 {161} 32. Nxa5 {183} 32... Nb6 {70} 33. c5 {85} 33... Rxc5
{176} 34. dxc5 {241} 34... Qxa1+ {30} 35. Kh2 {30} 35... Qxa5 {51 } 36. Qc6
{30} 36... Qa4 {73} 37. Qxa4 {30} 37... Nxa4 {30} 38. c6 {30} 38... Nb6 {266}
39. c7 { 30} 39... f6 {36} 40. Rb3 {108} 40... Nc8 {3630} 0-1

A New Rating System to Render FIDE Obsolete?

New ratings system backed by a billionaire in St. Louis and Gary Kasparov.......leading to......replacement of FIDE's rating system......leading to.........a new way of creating a ranking for the number one player(s) in the world.......leading to......FIDE becoming a dunsel organization with no need to exist.......leading to a new world governing/sanctioning body in private hands with no need of FIDE? One can hope and dream........
https://en.chessbase.com/post/new-format-for-grand-chess-tour-2018

Thursday, December 7, 2017

Brave New World--Artificial Intelligence Comes to Chess

I don't think there is much of a threat to people playing and keeping popular games such as Go and chess. Humans will accept that they can't defeat a computer program with or without AI. The problem is centered on how we as humans living and working in a variety of cultures (corporate, democratic, religious, etc) use or allow AI to be used. There is tremendous positive potential in many areas (medical research?), but also tremendous possibilities for mischief and, dare I say it, evil.

https://en.chessbase.com/post/the-future-is-here-alphazero-learns-chess

Saturday, December 2, 2017

World Chess Championship in London or St. Louis?

"The actual venue has yet to be announced although the organisers say they have several short-listed options. The prize fund is the world body Fide’s minimum of $1m, which could yet present a problem if Fabiano Caruana wins the eight-man candidates in Berlin in March. In that case the billionaire Rex Sinquefield, who has made his home city of St Louis into a global chess capital and who could easily fund a much larger purse, may try to have the match switched to the US."--Leonard Barden
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2017/dec/01/london-confirmed-for-magnus-carlsen-title-defence

Tuesday, November 28, 2017

Middlebury Quick Tournament This Saturday........

......in,,,,,drum roll, please......Middlebury, VT. Imagine that! Complete details can be found on the tournament page of this blog.

Wednesday, November 22, 2017

Agon, Ltd./World Chess and FIDE Attempting to Restrict Live Tournament Commentating

They've lost in courts from the US to Europe to Russia trying to restrict live transmission of the moves of FIDE tournaments. Now they are trying to restrict commentating on the moves live by FIDE GMs and IMs by suspending them for "ethical" violation. Here is the text of the Aon, Ltd./World Chess proposal to FIDE.

I'll comment on this further shortly.

World Chess    

To:       Members of the Working Group to Study the Proposal  of Agon Limited on Protection of Live Chess Moves
 
Dear Members of the Working Group,
First of all, I would like to thank Mr Strydom, Mr Rivello and Ms Sperdokli for their valuable comments to the Agon Limited proposal presented at the last Presidential Board meeting in March, 2017. All of them were taken into consideration when developing the wording of the draft FIDE Live Moves Broadcasting Policy (“Draft Policy”) attached to this letter. 
The Draft Policy recognizes the right of the World Chess Federation to control the live dissemination of the FIDE events’ moves. Furthermore, it provides for the measures to be taken against persons interfering with this right.
Pursuant to the Policy there are two types of violators – Type 1 and Type 2. Type 1 includes the members of FIDE family, whereas Type 2 covers organizations and individuals, who are not part of the FIDE family. 
The measures to be taken against Type 1 violators are already previewed in the Code of Ethics – the Draft Policy merely introduces the new rule that members of FIDE family shall comply with. 
As for the Type 2 violators, the Policy provides for indirect measures. Those persons are subject to inclusion to special FIDE list (“Blacklist”) and members of FIDE family are prohibited from cooperating with the blacklisted persons. Thus, the measures have an indirect effect – the prohibition is obligatory for members of FIDE family, and its violation shall be treated as the breach of FIDE Code of Ethics by the member of FIDE family. 
This method of restrictions on cooperation is similar to the EU or US sanctions, even thought the scope of the prohibition and its objectives are quite different from the political sanctions.
The main idea behind this prohibition is that chess community shall make an effort to ban freeriders from using the infrastructure provided by it. Individuals and organizations that do not respect the efforts of the chess events organizers and federations and continue to profit on live chess moves information without contributing to the staging of the events reduce the value of chess as professional sport and, thus, hinder its development and popularization. 
The prohibition will serve as a measure aimed at:
       making it possible for FIDE and FIDE events organizers to use on exclusive basis or sell the rights to live move-by-move broadcasting, thus providing an additional stream of revenue for FIDE events;
       stopping the practice of organization of unauthorized live move-by-move broadcasts by the third parties that only free-ride on the efforts of FIDE and organizers of its events, without contributing to the events themselves;
       will prevent chess players and other chess professionals from participating in these reprehensible practices.
Further, I would like to address the issues raised by Mr Strydom and Mr Rivello in their comments to the initial proposal.[1]
Who will be the "proprietor" of the broadcasting rights in the event of a tournament being held under the auspices of a federation or if the tournament is privately staged?
FIDE will be the “proprietor” of the broadcasting rights. The players will transfer this rights under the contracts for participation together with other commercial rights. The said rights will form a part of the TV and Internet broadcasting rights that are usually assigned to the organizer of the FIDE event in order to make it possible for the organizer to commercialize the event.
The FIDE Code of Ethics cannot be enforced against the members of general public that cannot somehow be brought into the notion of the "FIDE family". 
This is a very valuable point that was brought up by Mr Strydom. As it was mentioned earlier, the Draft Policy is only enforceable against the members of the FIDE family. Nevertheless, it effectively excludes the non-FIDE-family violators from the cooperation with the FIDE family chess community. I believe that this resolves the issue of freedom of commercial association and pursuit of commercial activity as well as the restrictions only apply to the members of FIDE family. 
Finally, there are still several questions that need to be addressed once the wording of the Policy is finalized. 
The first one being the possibility of implementation of similar policies on the national federation level and their recognition and enforcement by FIDE. I see the development of Model Broadcasting Policy for national federations as a perfect tool to address this. 
The second question is the temporary application of the Broadcasting Policy for the period after its approval by the working group and the Presidential Board/the Executive Board and its approval by the General Assembly. The point here is that at least FIDE can apply the prohibition on cooperation for this period, providing the idea to all the interested parties on how the Policy should work. However, in such case it is still to be decided which FIDE body or commission will take responsibility for updating the list of violators and who will have the final decision when it comes to establishing the fact of violation during this temporary period. 
I am looking forward to receiving your comments and suggestions on both this letter and attached Draft Policy. Thank you for your consideration on this matter!

Sincerely,
Matvey Shekhovtsov

Matvey Shekhovtsov
Member of Agon Limited/FIDE Interface Team
Agon Limited
10th of April 2017                                                 

FIDE LIVE MOVES BROADCASTING POLICY


1.  Introduction
1.1.  This section describes the Live moves broadcasting policy of FIDE (“Policy”).
1.2.  This Policy shall govern what action may be taken against any person (meaning either an individual or organization) that deliberately or through gross negligence violates the exclusive right to organize live move-by-move broadcast of FIDE events.
1.3.  The FIDE Ethics Commission is responsible for any actions to be taken in accordance with this Policy.

2.  Right to organize live moves broadcasting
2.1.  FIDE shall have the exclusive right to organize the live move-by-move broadcast of FIDE events (“Broadcasting right”). FIDE may at its sole discretion assign this right to third parties, including the organizer’s of FIDE events and/or its appointed commercial agencies. 
2.2.  The exclusivity of the Broadcasting right shall only extend for the whole duration of the broadcasted game. After the end of the game the notation can be used without any further restrictions.
2.3.  Use of up to 10 consecutive moves in one piece of communication (e.g. on one web-page; in one video piece) shall be regarded as fair use which does not interfere with the Broadcasting right.

3.  Violation of the Broadcasting right
3.1.  The following actions shall be regarded as violations of the Broadcasting right:
a) unauthorized live move-by-move broadcasting of FIDE events via any means of communication including, but not limited to Internet, Radio and Television;
b) participation in the unauthorized live move-by-move broadcasting as commentator or author;
c)  advertising and/or promoting unauthorized live move-by-move broadcasting.[2]

4.  Violators
4.1.  Type I violators («Violators I») include persons listed in item 1.4 of the FIDE Code of Ethics that performed actions listed in item 3.1 of this Policy.
4.2.  Type II violators («Violators II») include persons who are not listed in item 1.4 of the FIDE Code of Ethics that performed actions listed in item 3.1 of this Policy.
4.3.  The fact of the violation shall be determined by the FIDE Ethics Commission upon the complaint of the Broadcasting right holder

5.  Measures to be taken in respect of Violators I.
5.1.  Violation of the Broadcasting right by Violators I shall be considered to be a breach of the FIDE Code of Ethics.
5.2.  The general procedure previewed by the FIDE Code of Ethics and respective punishments shall apply.

6.  Measures to be taken in respect of Violators II. 
6.1.  Violators II shall be added to the special list (“FIDE Blacklist”) for the period to be determined by the FIDE Ethics Commission on the basis of the severity of violation. Such period in any case shall not exceed 10 (ten) years. 
6.2.  Persons listed in item 1.4 of the FIDE Code of Ethics are prohibited from entering into any commercial or other cooperation, partnership or any other contractual relationship with the persons listed on FIDE Blacklist. Violation of this provision shall be considered a breach of the FIDE Code of Ethics.
6.3.  FIDE Secretariat shall be responsible for updating the FIDE Blacklist in accordance with the decisions of the FIDE Ethics Commission and publishing it on the FIDE website.
6.4.  Person may be excluded from the FIDE Blacklist if it reaches an amicable agreement with the Broadcasting right holder and undertakes to abstain from violating the Broadcasting right in future. 




[1] see documents for 1st Quarter Presidential Board Meeting, Athens, Greece, 25-26 March 2017 (Annex 47A).
[2] This item does not apply to automated advertising services like Google AdWords or Yahoo! Bing Network. 

Tuesday, November 21, 2017

Dave Carter's Berlin Scholastics Simul

No word on how Dave did.........😇



VT Fall Scholastic Tournament and Dave Carter Simul a Great Success





Here are the results from Saturday's Berlin, VT event. Bravo to all who participated.

Grades K-2

#             Name    Grade   Round 1                Round 2                Round 3                Round 4                Total
1              Alexander Collins             2              W6         W7         W2         W3         4.0
2              Roland Ekstrom 2              W9         W5         L1            W6         3.0
3              Willard Peabody               2              D4           W9         W7         L1            2.5
4              Jace Grayson     1              D3           W10       L6            W8         2.5
5              Tomas Hynes     2              W11       L2            D8           W10       2.5
6              Elias O'Donald   1              L1            W11       W4         L2            2.0
7              William Kimberley-Stridsberg     1              W8         L1            L3            W11       2.0
8              René Simakaski 1              L7            B---        D5           L4            1.5
9              Jonathon Sicard 2              L2            L3            D10        B---        1.5
10           Quincy Moreno 1              B---        L4            D9           L5            1.5
11           Trent Loftus       2              L5            L6            B---        L7            1.0


 Grades 3-4

#             Name    Grade   Round 1                Round 2                Round 3                Round 4                Total
1              Sullivan Staff      3              W12       D5           W6         W2         3.5
2              Misha Chirkov   3              W14       W3         W4         L1            3.0
3              Jack Staff             4              W8         L2            W9         W5         3.0
4              Malachi Ogden 4              W11       W14       L2            W8         3.0
5              Emma Malroux 3              W9         D1           W7         L3            2.5
6              Tucker Hessel    4              W13       D7           L1            W10       2.5
7              Tessa Gordon    3              W10       D6           L5            W12       2.5
8              Jack White          4              L3            W13       W11       L4            2.0
9              August Simakaski             4              L5            W10       L3            W11       2.0
10           Flynn Moreno   4              L7            L9            W13       L6            1.0
11           Jacob Law            4              L4            W12       L8            L9            1.0
12           Archer Beth        3              L1            L11         W14       L7            1.0
13           Rowan Moran    3              L6            L8            L10         W14       1.0
14           Kealan Gottshall               3              L2            L4            L12         L13         0.0


 Grades 5-6

#             Name    Grade   Round 1                Round 2                Round 3                Round 4                Total
1              Jacob Graham   5              W19       W9         W8         W3         4.0
2              Kareem Schmidpeter     5              D15        W17       W4         W8         3.5
3              Mason Asaro      5              W10       W12       W5         L1            3.0
4              Graham Resmer               6              W14       W15       L2            W7         3.0
5              Hudson Grimes 5              W18       W7         L3            W11       3.0
6              Cade Jung            5              L7            W18       W9         W10       3.0
7              Charles Garavelli               5              W6         L5            W12       L4            2.0
8              Andrew Best      6              W13       W11       L1            L2            2.0
9              Tristan Gottshall               5              W17       L1            L6            W18       2.0
10           Bennett Moreno              5              L3            W19       W16       L6            2.0
11           Grace Best          5              W16       L8            W13       L5            2.0
12           Sawyer Cleary    5              B---        L3            L7            W16       2.0
13           Donovan Sicard 5              L8            B---        L11         W19       2.0
14           Savannah Staff  6              L4            L16         B---        W17       2.0
15           Thomas Sheehan             6              D2           L4            L17         B---        1.5
16           Max Derby          6              L11         W14       L10         L12         1.0
17           Griffon Beth       5              L9            L2            W15       L14         1.0
18           Samuel Sanderson           5              L5            L6            D19        L9            0.5
19           Aiden Collins      5              L1            L10         D18        L13         0.5


 Grades 7-8

#             Name    Grade   Round 1                Round 2                Round 3                Round 4                Total
1              Kai Jenkins-Mui 7              W6         W2         W5         W4         4.0
2              Simon Cafiero    7              W12       L1            W8         W6         3.0
3              Jack Brandon     8              W9         W11       L4            W5         3.0
4              Zakaria Arshad  8              D11        W9         W3         L1            2.5
5              Benjamin Parker               8              W10       W7         L1            L3            2.0
6              Christopher Dukeshire   7              L1            W12       W7         L2            2.0
7              Noah Sanderson               7              W8         L5            L6            W10       2.0
8              Thomas Garavelli              7              L7            W10       L2            W9         2.0
9              Marcus White    7              L3            L4            W12       L8            1.0
10           Uma Chirkova    8              L5            L8            W11       L7            1.0
11           Leo Brown          8              D4           L3            L10         D12        1.0
12           Timothy McHugh             7              L2            L6            L9            D11        0.5


 Grades 9-12

#             Name    Grade   Round 1                Round 2                Round 3                Round 4                Total
1              Ragulan Sivakumar          10           W10       W1         D4           D3           3.0
2              Michael Cafiero 10           W7         L2            W3         W4         3.0
3              Sasha Kagle        11           W5         W6         L1            D2           2.5
4              Danis Ly                11           W6         W8         D2           L1            2.5
5              Noah Howe        10           L3            W10       D8           W9         2.5
6              Aedan Taylor      11           L4            L3            W7         W8         2.0
7              Curtis Johnson  11           L1            W9         L6            W10       2.0
8              Zac Hinds             11           W9         L4            D5           L6            1.5
9              Koby Sol Cruz     9              L8            L7            W10       L5            1.0

10           Bruce Pandya    9              L2            L5            L9            L7            0.0